Trading in influence

Glossary category

What is trading in influence?

Trading in influence is a corruption-related offence involving the claimed use of influence or contacts within a public institution or other entity covered by the law in exchange for an undue advantage. It is often described as influence peddling or paid protection. The central issue is not lawful professional representation of interests, but an undertaking to use informal connections or personal influence to obtain a favourable handling of a matter.

Under Polish criminal law, trading in influence is regulated primarily by Article 230 and Article 230a of the Polish Penal Code. These provisions address both sides of the arrangement. One person may be held liable for claiming influence or contacts and undertaking to act as an intermediary in handling a matter in return for a benefit. Another person may be liable for offering, promising, or providing a benefit so that someone uses such influence.

The offence may concern matters handled by state institutions, local-government institutions, international or domestic organisations, or foreign organisational units that dispose of public funds. The relevant matter may relate, for example, to a permit, public procurement procedure, administrative decision, criminal case, tax matter, licence, inspection, or employment in an institution covered by the law.

Actual influence does not always need to exist. Criminal liability may arise where a person falsely claims to have contacts or influence, or creates or reinforces another person’s belief that such influence exists, and undertakes to intervene in return for an advantage. What matters is the representation that the person can affect the handling of a matter through unofficial channels.


What does trading in influence involve?

Trading in influence usually involves three elements: a person claiming to have influence or connections, an undertaking to intervene in a matter, and an undue advantage offered or accepted in return. The advantage may be financial, but it does not have to take the form of cash. It may include gifts, services, preferential treatment, employment, debt relief, sponsorship, travel, or another personal or business benefit.

The conduct may be direct or indirect. A person may personally contact a public official, ask an intermediary to do so, or undertake to arrange a meeting or conversation as part of intervening in the handling of a matter. The offence can also occur where the promised intervention is unsuccessful. The lack of a favourable decision does not necessarily exclude liability if the unlawful arrangement itself was made.

Trading in influence should be distinguished from lawful lobbying, legal representation, and ordinary business communication. A lawyer, advocate, attorney-at-law, consultant, or lobbyist may lawfully represent a client’s interests, submit applications, participate in proceedings, and communicate with authorities within the applicable legal framework. The boundary is crossed where a person seeks payment for unofficial intervention based on personal relationships, claimed access, or improper influence over the handling of a matter.

The offence is also distinct from bribery, although both offences are closely connected. Bribery generally concerns an undue advantage offered to a person performing a public function. Trading in influence concerns an intermediary who claims that they can affect such a person or institution. Depending on the facts, one case may involve both bribery and trading in influence.


When is legal assistance advisable?

Legal assistance may be important as soon as a person receives a proposal suggesting that a matter can be “arranged” through contacts in a state institution, local-government institution, organisation, or other entity covered by the relevant provisions. Particular caution is needed where the proposed payment is not linked to a transparent and lawful service, but to an expected outcome in a pending proceeding or administrative matter.

Individuals may need legal advice when they are asked to provide money, gifts, employment, or another benefit in exchange for assistance with a public matter. Businesses may face similar risks in connection with public procurement, permits, tax proceedings, inspections, regulatory decisions, subsidies, licences, or dealings with public entities. Managers and employees should also react appropriately when an intermediary claims to have informal access to officials or decision-makers.

A prompt consultation can help assess whether a proposed arrangement creates criminal risk, identify the relevant evidence, and determine how communication should be handled. Early legal advice may reduce the risk of making statements, transfers, or commitments that could later be interpreted as offering an undue advantage. It may also help prevent financial loss, internal compliance failures, reputational damage, and criminal liability.

In cases involving allegations of trading in influence, the factual context is particularly important. Legal analysis may depend on the content of conversations, emails, messages, contracts, payments, the role of each participant, and whether an alleged intermediary claimed influence over a matter covered by the relevant provisions. A defence strategy should therefore be based on a careful review of the evidence and the applicable criminal provisions.


Legal support in matters concerning trading in influence

Legal support in matters concerning trading in influence may include in particular:

  • assessment of criminal-law risks connected with proposed transactions or intermediaries;
  • analysis of communications, agreements, payments, and other evidence;
  • advice for individuals, company executives, and employees before taking further action;
  • representation during questioning, investigation, and court proceedings;
  • defence of suspects and accused persons in corruption-related cases;
  • support for injured parties and entities affected by unlawful influence arrangements;
  • internal review of compliance procedures and reporting channels.


Need legal assistance regarding trading in influence? Contact us.


See also