Expert advice

EU Citizens Expelled from Poland: When and Why It Happens

26.06.2026

EU citizen deportation in Poland means a formal administrative decision requiring an EU national to leave Poland because their stay is considered incompatible with limited grounds allowed under EU and Polish law. In legal terms, this is usually described as expulsion or removal, not “deportation” in the ordinary non-legal sense.

For companies, managers, employees, and private individuals, the practical consequences can be serious: interruption of employment, loss of residence rights, reputational risk, family separation, and possible entry restrictions. The issue often appears after criminal proceedings, security concerns, or administrative findings connected with public order.

This is informational material, not legal advice. The assessment of an EU citizen removal case depends on the facts, the person’s residence history, family situation, conduct, and the legal basis used by the authorities.

Free movement restriction: the basic rule for EU citizens in Poland

EU citizens benefit from the right of free movement and residence under Directive 2004/38/EC and the Polish Act of 14 July 2006 on the entry into, stay in and exit from the territory of Poland of nationals of EU Member States and their family members [1], [2]. This right is not absolute, but restrictions must be interpreted narrowly.

The key point is that an EU citizen cannot be expelled from Poland merely because of nationality, lack of local connections, or a general belief that foreign nationals should not remain in the country. The authorities must identify a lawful reason and justify it individually.

The three exceptions are:

public policy
public security
public health

These exceptions are set out in Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC. Polish law implements them mainly through provisions of the 2006 Act concerning expulsion of EU citizens and their family members, including Article 68 and related provisions [1], [2].

When can an EU citizen be expelled from Poland?

An expulsion decision must be based on the individual conduct of the person concerned. Under Article 27(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC, that conduct must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society [1]. This is a high threshold.

A past conviction does not automatically justify expulsion. Criminal history may be relevant, but the authority must assess what the conviction shows about the person’s current risk. A minor, old, or isolated offence will not always meet the legal standard. On the other hand, repeated serious offences, organised crime links, violent conduct, terrorism-related concerns, or offences showing ongoing risk may support a removal decision, depending on the evidence.

Authorities should also assess proportionality. Article 28 of Directive 2004/38/EC requires consideration of factors such as length of residence, age, health, family and economic situation, social and cultural integration, and links with the country of origin [1]. These factors can be decisive in practice.

EU citizen removal after a criminal conviction in Poland

Criminal proceedings often trigger immigration consequences. In Poland, a judgment in a criminal case may become part of the factual background for an expulsion assessment, especially in cases involving violence, drugs, organised economic crime, fraud, corruption, sexual offences, or threats to state security.

However, the legal analysis must remain separate. The criminal court decides guilt and penalty. The administrative authority decides whether residence in Poland should be restricted. The fact of conviction is evidence, but it does not replace the proportionality test required by EU law.

This distinction matters for business and employment. An employer may need to know whether a key employee can continue working in Poland. A board member may face reputational issues or operational disruption if expulsion proceedings overlap with criminal proceedings. In cross-border cases, the risk may also connect with a European Arrest Warrant. KKZ lawyers regularly analyse such situations where criminal defence, immigration consequences, and business continuity must be assessed together.

Levels of protection against expulsion

EU law provides stronger protection to persons who are more integrated in the host state. The following structure is useful in practice:

Situation of the EU citizen	Legal threshold for expulsion
Short-term or ordinary residence	Public policy, public security, or public health, subject to individual and proportionality assessment
Permanent residence, usually after five years of continuous lawful residence	Expulsion only on serious grounds of public policy or public security under Article 28(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC
Residence in the host Member State for the previous ten years, or minor status	Expulsion only on imperative grounds of public security, with special protection for minors and the best-interests exception under Article 28(3) of Directive 2004/38/EC

This does not mean that long-term residence makes expulsion impossible. It means that the authority must meet a higher legal standard and provide stronger reasons.

Public health as a ground for EU citizen deportation Poland

Public health is the narrowest and least common ground. Under Article 29 of Directive 2004/38/EC, only diseases with epidemic potential as defined by relevant World Health Organization instruments, and other infectious diseases or contagious parasitic diseases covered by host-state protective provisions, may justify free movement restrictions [1].

Importantly, diseases occurring after a three-month period from the date of arrival cannot justify expulsion under Article 29(2) of the Directive [1]. The public health exception cannot be used as a general tool against persons who are ill, disabled, or expensive for the healthcare system.

Procedure and defence in expulsion cases

An EU citizen facing removal should receive a decision that states the reasons, the legal basis, and information about available remedies. Under Directive 2004/38/EC, the person must be notified in a way that allows understanding of the content and implications of the decision, subject to limited security exceptions [1].

In Poland, expulsion decisions are handled under the 2006 Act and administrative procedure rules, including appeal and court review mechanisms [2], [3], [4]. Deadlines are important and should be checked immediately in the decision. In many administrative matters the appeal deadline is 14 days, but the exact remedy depends on the issuing authority and the specific decision.

A practical defence usually focuses on:

whether the authority identified one of the lawful grounds;
whether the alleged threat is current, genuine and sufficiently serious;
whether the decision relies only on a past conviction;
whether proportionality factors were properly assessed;
whether family life, employment, business activity, and integration were considered;
whether the authority respected procedural rights and provided reasons.

Why expulsion risk matters for companies and management

EU citizen removal can affect more than the individual. Companies may face disruption if a director, shareholder, specialist, or key employee is required to leave Poland. The risk is higher where criminal allegations concern economic crime, corruption, fraud, money laundering, workplace misconduct, or offences connected with regulated sectors.

From a compliance perspective, the company should separate employment, regulatory, and criminal issues. Internal findings should be documented carefully. Premature statements may create reputation risk, while lack of action may expose management to criticism from regulators, shareholders, or business partners.

Where expulsion risk arises after criminal allegations, it is usually necessary to coordinate criminal defence, administrative procedure, employment decisions, and communication strategy. Kopeć & Zaborowski (KKZ) handles such matters at the intersection of criminal law, business risk, and cross-border consequences.

Contact in criminal matters linked to expulsion risk

If an expulsion risk is connected with criminal allegations, including cases concerning sexual offences, it may be necessary to obtain an early assessment of the criminal and administrative consequences. A lawyer can help review the decision, evidence, deadlines, and possible next steps.

To discuss a case confidentially, it is possible to contact a criminal lawyer in Poland and obtain an assessment of the situation before procedural deadlines expire.

FAQ: EU Citizens Expelled from Poland

Can an EU citizen be deported from Poland?

Yes, but only in limited cases. EU citizen deportation Poland is possible mainly on grounds of public policy, public security, or public health, and the decision must be individual and proportionate.

Is a criminal conviction enough to expel an EU citizen?

No. A conviction may be relevant, but Article 27(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC states that previous criminal convictions cannot in themselves justify expulsion. The authority must show a current and sufficiently serious threat.

Does long residence in Poland protect against removal?

Yes, it increases protection. Permanent residents may be expelled only on serious grounds of public policy or public security. Persons who have resided in Poland for the previous ten years receive even stronger protection, assessed in light of their actual integration and the facts of the case.

Can Poland expel an EU citizen for public health reasons?

Only in narrow circumstances. Public health restrictions are limited by Article 29 of Directive 2004/38/EC and cannot be used broadly against persons who develop health problems after the initial three-month period or for general healthcare-cost reasons.

Can an EU citizen appeal an expulsion decision in Poland?

Yes. The decision should indicate the appeal route and deadline. Depending on the stage, remedies may include administrative appeal and judicial review before an administrative court.

Can expulsion be combined with an entry ban?

Restrictions on re-entry may arise depending on the decision and legal basis. The scope, duration, and possibility of challenging such measures depend on the facts and the wording of the decision.

What should be checked first after receiving an expulsion decision?

The key points are the deadline for appeal, the authority that issued the decision, the legal ground relied on, the evidence of current threat, and whether proportionality factors were properly assessed.

Bibliography

Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, Articles 27-31.
Act of 14 July 2006 on the entry into, stay in and exit from the territory of the Republic of Poland of nationals of the European Union Member States and their family members, Journal of Laws of Poland, consolidated text as amended.
Act of 14 June 1960 – Code of Administrative Procedure, Journal of Laws of Poland, consolidated text as amended.
Act of 30 August 2002 – Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts, Journal of Laws of Poland, consolidated text as amended.
Court of Justice of the European Union, Case 30/77, R v Bouchereau, judgment of 27 October 1977.
Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-145/09, Tsakouridis, judgment of 23 November 2010.
Court of Justice of the European Union, Joined Cases C-331/16 and C-366/16, K. and H.F., judgment of 2 May 2018.

Need help?