经验
法院拒绝逮捕我们的客户 | THE COURT REFUSED TO ARREST OUR CLIENT
我们为一名客户辩护——他是一位商人兼前参议员,因涉嫌从国家残疾人康复基金(PFRON)和社会保险机构(ZUS)骗取数千万兹罗提而被拘留。检方对此指控提出了临时拘留的请求。在我们对该决定提出上诉后,法院认定指控缺乏依据,因此拒绝对我们的客户实施逮捕。这一结果具有重大意义,尤其是因为数据显示,94%的临时拘留请求都会被法院批准。该案在媒体上广泛报道。
We defended a client – a businessman and former senator – who was detained on charges of extorting tens of millions of zlotys from the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled (PFRON) and the Social Insurance Institution (ZUS). The prosecution requested detention on remand in connection with these charges. Following our appeal against this decision, the court refused to arrest our client after concluding that the charges were unfounded. This was a huge success, especially as statistics show that 94% of pre-trial detention requests are granted by the courts. The case was widely reported in the media.
Case study
关于波兰特勤局操作的法律意见 | OPINION ON OPERATIONS OF SPECIAL SERVICES IN POLAND
关于波兰特勤局操作的法律意见 | OPINION ON OPERATIONS OF SPECIAL SERVICES IN POLAND俄罗斯公民引渡案 | EXTRADITION OF A RUSSIAN NATIONAL
俄罗斯公民引渡案 | EXTRADITION OF A RUSSIAN NATIONAL国际投资基金的跨学科咨询服务 | INTERDISCIPLINARY ADVISORY SERVICES FOR AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT FUND
国际投资基金的跨学科咨询服务 | INTERDISCIPLINARY ADVISORY SERVICES FOR AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT FUND我们如何帮助您?
联系专家